- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:31:07 +1100
- To: Vincent Murphy <vdm@vdm.ie>
- Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Well, not *that* portable. I don't think HTTP should be talking about the syntactic details of specific media types. Delegating this to media type definitions would be the most sensible long-term thing to do, although some sort of advice would be needed in the meantime... On 28/02/2009, at 10:39 PM, Vincent Murphy wrote: > The id attribute value (if one exists) of the <a> anchor element used > to initiate the HTTP request in the user agent would be used as a > fragment identifier in the referer URI. This is in exactly the same > way as fragment identifiers is used to identify a destination anchor > in current practice. > > I think this mechanism is portable across media types. > > 2009/2/26 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>: >> Yes - part of that discussion needs to be exactly what is included >> in the >> referer URI. > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2009 00:31:46 UTC