- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@messagingarchitects.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:34:42 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Lisa Dusseault <lisad@messagingarchitects.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Feb 4, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > I'm not sure what your point is... That there are servers and > clients out there which are broken with respect to weak etag > handling? I agree with that, but I do not agree that this means the > PATCH spec should rule out their use. Nothing to do with PATCH -- I got my threads crossed. > > PS: And, btw, httpbis currently *does* define that W/"foo" and "foo" > match weakly; see <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-05.html#rfc.section.5 > > and <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/71>. This is great. I looked for this before starting my rant, but sorry to say I missed it. Thanks! Lisa --- Scanned by M+ Guardian Messaging Firewall --- Messaging Architects sponsors The Spamhaus Project.
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 20:36:42 UTC