- From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:50:56 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Lisa Dusseault <lisad@messagingarchitects.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi Julian, --On January 30, 2009 6:01:00 PM +0100 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > I think what you're looking for is > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-http-prefer-00>. This used to be > in the PATCH I-D, but James moved it into a separate spec (which I think > was a good idea in order to keep PATCH as simple as possible). Yes, that looks good, but it is expired. However, the definition of 209 in PATCH still seems a little odd without reference to that. Is 209 absolutely needed in PATCH? Could that instead be moved to James document as a separate section describing the interaction of Prefer and PATCH? Alternatively we could progress James document at the same time as PATCH and cross-reference - but maybe we don't want to delay PATCH. -- Cyrus Daboo
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 20:51:41 UTC