- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:24:21 +0100
- To: yngve@opera.com
- CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen wrote: > > Hello all, > > The 301 and 302 sections of HTTPbis seems to make the implicit, or > perhaps not clearly stated, assumption that the new request shall use > the same method as the request triggering the response. Just for the record: this text hasn't been changes since RFC2616... > ... I'm a bit uncomfortable changing the text for 301. After all, for temporary redirects, two new alternatives are there (303 -> GET, 307 -> same method). We don't have the same thing for 301. Do we need that? BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 23 December 2008 13:25:07 UTC