Re: #90: multipart/byteranges

On Dec 10, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> I think that the core of the issue is that the current text --  
> intentionally or not -- leaves the door open for use of multipart/ 
> byteranges as a delimiter in other situations, provided that the  
> sender "knows" that the receiver can parse it (one way of knowing  
> this is specified, but others may exist).
> As such, the question is whether we want to leave that door open.  
> Either way, the intent should be clearly stated.

I say "no" -- close the loophole and remove any notion that multipart
delimits message framing.


Received on Thursday, 11 December 2008 01:26:04 UTC