- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:01:15 -0500 (EST)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Mark Nottingham wrote: >> ... >> <t>HTML4 also has a "rev" parameter for links that allows a link's >> relation to be reversed. The Link header >> has a "rev" parameter to allow the expression of these links in >> HTTP headers, but its use is not encouraged, >> due to the confusion this mechanism causes as well as conflicting >> interpretations among HTML versions.</t> >> ... > > OK, it seems I'm missing something here. Could somebody explain to me, what > the conflicting interpretations are, and which we prefer (and why?)? > > HTML2 (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1866#section-5.7.3>): > > REL > The REL attribute gives the relationship(s) described by > the hyperlink. The value is a whitespace separated list > of relationship names. The semantics of link > relationships are not specified in this document. > > REV > same as the REL attribute, but the semantics of the > relationship are in the reverse direction. A link from A > to B with REL="X" expresses the same relationship as a > link from B to A with REV="X". An anchor may have both > REL and REV attributes. In that case, it's not a reversed link, but still a normal forward link, but it expressed a reversed relationship. A: link rel="bigger than" B is the same relation as B: link rev="smaller than" A Same relation, but different links (and different authority claiming the relationship between both A and B). In the HTML4 example, it's reverse and forward links, so the links are supposed equivalent, so not only the relation is equivalent, but also the link. I prefer far more the "relationship equivalence" as defined in HTML2. > HTML4 (<http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#rev-link>): > > 12.3.1 Forward and reverse links > > The rel and rev attributes play complementary roles -- the rel > attribute specifies a forward link and the rev attribute specifies a > reverse link. > > Consider two documents A and B. > > Document A: <LINK href="docB" rel="foo"> > > Has exactly the same meaning as: > > Document B: <LINK href="docA" rev="foo"> > > Both attributes may be specified simultaneously. > > > > Best regards, Julian > -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 11:01:24 UTC