- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:03:40 +0100
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, mnot@mnot.net, Robert.Siemer-httpwg@backsla.sh, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > ... > Extension methods MAY define their own cache rules, but only applies to > caches implementing the same. PROPFIND has already been mentioned in > this discussion and as a note can be mentioned that a cache which only > implements the base HTTP/1.1 specifications will invalidate any cached > objects on the URI when seeing a PROPFIND request for that URI. > ... The method registry we're building (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-00.html>) will tell implementers that PROPFIND is safe -- that should be sufficient for not requiring invalidate, right? BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 18:04:33 UTC