- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:00:19 +0100
- To: Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Dan Winship wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> OLD:
>>
>> NOT ignore any Content-* (e.g. Content-Range) headers that it does
>> not understand or implement and MUST return a 501 (Not Implemented)
>> response in such cases.
>>
>> NEW:
>>
>> NOT ignore any Content-* headers (e.g. headers starting with the
>> prefix 'Content-') that it does not understand or implement and MUST
>> return a 501 (Not Implemented) response in such cases.
>
> s/e.g./i.e./. (Or just get rid of it.) Otherwise it suggests that there
> are "Content-* headers" that don't start with "Content-".
Good catch. So
OLD:
NOT ignore any Content-* (e.g. Content-Range) headers that it does
not understand or implement and MUST return a 501 (Not Implemented)
response in such cases.
NEW:
NOT ignore any Content-* headers (headers starting with the prefix
'Content-') that it does not understand or implement and MUST return
a 501 (Not Implemented) response in such cases.
BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2008 15:07:43 UTC