Re: must a partial response range be exact?

Brian Smith wrote:
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>> A linear sequence of in-order ranges MAY be merged in the 
>> response. If there is only a single range left after such 
>> merges then it SHOULD be sent as a Content-Range response 
>> instead of multipart/byteranges, but MAY be sent as 
>> multipart/byteranges is the sender prefer..The recipient MUST 
>> accept both as valid responses, in addition to the 1-1 mapped 
>> multipart/byteranges response or any other response that do 
>> cover the requested ranges including (but not limited to) a 
>> full non-ranged response.
> This is how I read it too, except for the "but MAY be sent as
> multipart/byteranges." multipart/byteranges requires two parts.

Brian, do you disagree with the proposed resolution for issue 133, or 
did you miss it?

BR, Julian

Received on Saturday, 11 October 2008 10:30:16 UTC