- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:07:15 +0100
- To: Andrew Daviel <advax@triumf.ca>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1196953635.4331.57.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
On tis, 2007-12-04 at 13:34 -0800, Andrew Daviel wrote: ' > As I read the RFC, a server should send a Vary header to indicate that > the response should only be cached if the listed header values match. > When I look at the Apache server, I see that it sends "Vary: lang" > even for requests without "Accept: lang", so maybe it's also an > indication that different languages are available if the client were to > ask. Yes. Vary lists the header the server looked for when determining the response. Not only the headers the server found.. > What I was wondering is, would it be acceptable for a server to > send "Vary: geo-position" to an initial request, which would then > generate a user dialogue if the server was not previously known. Yes, if the response varies based on the position. > The client would then send "Geo-Postion: lat;long" (or not) > in the next and subsequent requests, and cached responses could be > re-used on match. Yes, that's fine. > Or, should we use a different extension header for the server to indicate > its willingness to accept position data and hence trigger a dialogue, > such as "Accept-Geo-Position: true" The two doesn't exclude each other. With "Vary: Geo-Position" the server says "I am interested in your position as the response varies depending on where you are. With a new "I want Geo-Position" header without using Vary the server says "I want to know your position for tracking reasons, but it doesn't affect the response I send to you". Accept-Geo-Position is probably not a name for the header unless you want to define a syntax for specifying what kinds of geo-position the server accepts.. should be someting not starting with Accept- I think. I suggest you start with Vary, and then look into additional in-band or out-of-band negotiation of the feature if found needed. Note: There was a releated proposal some timeago how to negotiate extensions, with the aim of controlling transmission of user personal information / profile. Regards Henrik
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2007 15:07:47 UTC