Re: RFC2616 erratum "languagetag"

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:18:05PM +0100,
>  Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote 
>  a message of 11 lines which said:
> 
>> Do we have lazy consensus that HTTP should use the language matching
>> defined in RFC4647?
> 
> Yes for me, in order to avoid making the HTTP RFC even bigger.

My goal is to make it smaller :-). For instance, there's also lots of 
historic information about URIs which I hope is better covered in RFC3986...

BR, Julian

Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 09:19:16 UTC