- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:21:32 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Now i91; <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/ #i91> (editorial). On 14/11/2007, at 5:14 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Hi, > > I was just looking at Section 9 (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/ > rfc2616#section-9>)...: > > The set of common methods for HTTP/1.1 is defined below. Although > this set can be expanded, additional methods cannot be assumed to > share the same semantics for separately extended clients and > servers. > > The Host request-header field (section 14.23) MUST accompany all > HTTP/1.1 requests. > > ...any reason why the Host header requirement is listed here so > prominently (duplicating text from 14.23)? > > Best regards, Julian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 05:21:42 UTC