Re: NEW ISSUE: message-body in CONNECT response

On tis, 2007-11-27 at 04:55 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Recommending the use of 204 would be clearer, but I suspect there is
> many implementations failing seeing anything else than 200.. (Squid
> being one of them.. now fixed)

Correction: Squid did not fail this.. was just a little tired..

Regards
Henrik

Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2007 04:00:19 UTC