- From: Dan Winship <dan.winship@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:21:58 -0500
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
As implemented in the real world, a successful response to a CONNECT request does not include a message-body. But this isn't stated in RFC 2817, and is actually forbidden by RFC 2616. draft-luotonen-web-proxy-tunneling said: Example of a response: HTTP/1.0 200 Connection established Proxy-agent: Netscape-Proxy/1.1 ...data tunnelled from the server... After the empty line [that follows the message-headers], the proxy will start passing data from the client connection to the remote server connection but RFC 2817 (5.3) removes the lack-of-message-body implication: Any successful (2xx) response to a CONNECT request indicates that the proxy has established a connection to the requested host and port, and has switched to tunneling the current connection to that server connection. And RFC 2616 (4.3) requires a 200 response to a CONNECT to have a message-body anyway: All responses to the HEAD request method MUST NOT include a message-body, even though the presence of entity-header fields might lead one to believe they do. All 1xx (informational), 204 (no content), and 304 (not modified) responses MUST NOT include a message-body. All other responses do include a message-body, although it MAY be of zero length. So to fix things, RFC 2616 4.3 should be updated to include "A successful (2xx) response to a CONNECT request MUST NOT include a message-body." And if 2817 is in-scope for 2616bis then the fact should probably be reiterated there too. -- Dan
Received on Monday, 26 November 2007 19:22:11 UTC