- From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:06:11 -0800 (PST)
- cc: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On ons, 2007-11-21 at 22:33 -0800, David Morris wrote: > > > > Should be a chunk extension, not new length.. i.e. something like > > > > > > 0; aborted > > > Only if current recipients will not ignore the 'aborted' and consider the > > entity complete. > > Why? > > What's important is that current recipients correctly understands that > as "end-of-message". > > We are talking mainly about aborting the request entity after the server > have already said "I am not interested", not the response entity. Because I believe it critical to safe operation that an abort be recognized by the recipient of the 'message'. Passing an abort signal in a way that it it ignored under extensiblity rules, etc. makes for the possiblity of misunderstanding.
Received on Friday, 23 November 2007 23:06:42 UTC