- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:25:23 +0100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > assuming we replaced RFC2396's host with RCF3986's host, the > following would become legal: > Host: :81 > Bug or feature? At some point ABNF is lost, <reg-name> can take rather odd forms: http://%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%8B%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5.boldlygoingnowhere.org/xhtml1-i18n.dtd Syntactically valid, I think. It's less clear what it means. Frank
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2007 11:29:42 UTC