- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:29:34 +0100
- To: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2007 06:29:55 UTC
On ons, 2007-11-21 at 18:32 -0800, David Morris wrote: > Also, I thing the notion of a chunk length of -1 deserves further > discusion. Seems to me that if a recipient understands the new value as > abort, then the connection can continue to be used. If the recipient > doesn't understand the signal, it should be treated as a serious error > resulting in an abort of the request and connection. If I've not missed > something, that leaves older recipients protected while allowing a useful > tweak to the protocol. Should be a chunk extension, not new length.. i.e. something like 0; aborted Regards Henrik
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2007 06:29:55 UTC