- From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:33:25 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > Alexey Melnikov wrote: > >>> vs "Host" (the header name) >>> >>> I currently have a slight preference for not changing the rule names >>> for headers (and to keep them consistent), which would require >>> renaming "trailer" and "host" to something else. >>> >>> Alternatively we could rename the rule names for the headers by >>> adding a common prefix or postfix. >> >> IMHO, that would be slightly better if you want to reference RFC 2396 >> or RFC 3986. It would also prevent any future conflicts. >> >> But you can also do something like the following for the <host>: >> >> uri-host = <host as defined in RFC 3986> > > Funny enough right now by edits say: > > host-component = <host, defined in [RFC2396], Section 3.2.2> Too bad that ABNF doesn't allow for namespaces ;-).
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 19:36:08 UTC