Re: Via MUST discussion

On ons, 2007-11-14 at 11:25 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> OTOH, making this requirement a SHOULD is probably closer to  
> reflecting current practice, especially if we were to have some  
> explanatory text about it.


There is no reason to have MUST level requirements without any
noticeable impact on the operations of the protocol. And Via is
certainly in that category.


Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2007 01:16:56 UTC