Re: cacheability of status 303

Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Also, we seem to be implicitly dropping the note to implementers WRT  
> HTTP/1.0 support for 303. Are we confident that this is no longer a  
> problem?

IIRC it's a problem for "Netscape 3" (Mozilla 3).  In HTTP/1.0
compatibility mode servers better stick to 302, compare
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss/current/msg00818.html

 Frank

Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2007 06:41:52 UTC