- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:43:17 +1000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Now i86.
<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i86>
On 15/09/2007, at 8:25 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while others work on the progress issues, I'd like to close some of
> the more trivial issues in the current draft.... Here's the first one:
>
> Normative up-to-date references
>
> The references below are normative and should be classified as
> such. None of them needs updating:
>
> RFC1864 ("The Content-MD5 Header Field")
>
> RFC2045 ("Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One:
> Format of Internet Message Bodies")
>
> RFC2046 ("Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two:
> Media Types")
>
> RFC2047 ("MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three:
> Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text")
>
> RFC2119 ("Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels")
>
> RFC2617 ("HTTP Authentication: Basic and Digest Access
> Authentication")
>
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 06:45:22 UTC