- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:43:16 +1000
- To: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Now i87 (usually this would just be an instruction to the editors, but since it's in the base RFC, it's worth capturing). <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i87> On 08/09/2007, at 10:49 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > This typo is still in the current draft. > > s/ought to used/ought to be used/; > > ....Roy > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Nathan Collette <ncollette ... sabioso.com> > ... >> I understand that you are the current editor of RFC 2616. I was >> reading the specification and I came across an error in section >> 13.2.2 Heuristic Expiration. >> >> "they ought to used cautiously, and we encourage" should be "they >> ought to *be* used cautiously, and we encourage" >> >> Just thought you might care, >> Nate > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 06:45:18 UTC