ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2007 by date

Saturday, 30 June 2007

DIFF format sketch edgar@edgarschwarz.de

Friday, 29 June 2007

Re: Regarding dynamic ip addressed for HTTP Servers. Henrik Nordstrom
Regarding dynamic ip addressed for HTTP Servers. SiM

Thursday, 28 June 2007

Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
Re: PATCH Draft Stefan Eissing
Re: PATCH Draft Stefan Eissing
Re: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
RE: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
Re: PATCH Draft Jeffrey Mogul
RE: PATCH Draft Cyrus Daboo
RE: PATCH Draft Yaron Goland
RE: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Yaron Goland
Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] James M Snell
RE: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft Larry Masinter
RE: PATCH Draft Larry Masinter
RE: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Larry Masinter
Re: PATCH Draft Cyrus Daboo
Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] James M Snell
RE: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Larry Masinter

Tuesday, 26 June 2007

on the subject of DHCPv4 David W. Hankins
Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft Julian Reschke
Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft Cyrus Daboo
Re: PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
PATCH and WebDAV, was Re: PATCH Draft Cyrus Daboo
Re: PATCH Draft Julian Reschke
Re: Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Julian Reschke
Re: PATCH Draft Julian Reschke
Re: PATCH Draft Stefan Eissing
RE: PATCH Draft Larry Masinter
Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
Re: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
Re: PATCH Draft James M Snell
Re: PATCH Draft Lisa Dusseault

Monday, 25 June 2007

RE: PATCH Draft Larry Masinter
Required DIFF format [was Re: PATCH Draft] Lisa Dusseault
Re: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
Re: PATCH Draft Henrik Nordstrom
Re: PATCH Draft Stefan Eissing
PATCH Draft James M Snell
Re: HTTPbis BOF at Chicago Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 24 June 2007

Re: HTTPbis BOF at Chicago Robert Sayre

Saturday, 23 June 2007

Re: FYI: HTTP intermediary conformance Mark Nottingham
Re: FYI: HTTP intermediary conformance Justin Erenkrantz
FYI: HTTP intermediary conformance Mark Nottingham

Friday, 22 June 2007

HTTPbis BOF at Chicago Alexey Melnikov
Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Eric Lawrence
Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Harhalakis Stefanos
RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Larry Masinter
Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 21 June 2007

Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request David Morris
Re: If-match clarification Jeffrey Mogul
RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Larry Masinter
RE: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Larry Masinter
Re: If-match clarification Henrik Nordstrom

Wednesday, 20 June 2007

Re: If-match clarification Cyrus Daboo
Re: If-match clarification Henrik Nordstrom
If-match clarification Cyrus Daboo
Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom
Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies - OT, topical re WPAD Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy

Tuesday, 19 June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom
Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke
Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Henrik Nordstrom
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Jamie Lokier
Re: [RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke
Re: i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Henrik Nordstrom
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
i51 HTTP-date vs. rfc1123-date, was: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Julian Reschke
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrian Chadd
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrian Chadd
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Mark Andrews
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Travis Snoozy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Mark Andrews
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Lisa Dusseault
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom

Monday, 18 June 2007

Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Jeffrey Mogul
Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Lisa Dusseault
Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
migration to ABNF, was: i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
i31 (qdtext BNF) resolved Julian Reschke
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis tom.petch
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: FW: BCP0097 RFC 4897 on Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents Julian Reschke
Re: FW: BCP0097 RFC 4897 on Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents Julian Reschke
RE: protocol support for intercepting proxies Joris Dobbelsteen
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Travis Snoozy
FW: BCP0097 RFC 4897 on Handling Normative References to Standards-Track Documents Larry Masinter
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrian Chadd
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Travis Snoozy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy

Sunday, 17 June 2007

Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Travis Snoozy
Re: protocol support for intercepting proxies Henrik Nordstrom
protocol support for intercepting proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom

Saturday, 16 June 2007

[RFC] HTTP Information Request Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? Adrien de Croy
Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Julian Reschke

Friday, 15 June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman
Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? Henrik Nordstrom
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman
RE: 305 Use Proxy deprecated? Eric Lawrence
Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Julian Reschke
Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Travis Snoozy
Re: my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Julian Reschke
my action item on issue 52 (Sort 1.3 Terminology) Julian Reschke
305 Use Proxy deprecated? Adrien de Croy

Thursday, 14 June 2007

Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Adrien de Croy
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis tom.petch
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis tom.petch
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Roy T. Fielding
Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Travis Snoozy
Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Adrien de Croy
Re: HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Travis Snoozy
HTTP version numbers returned by proxies Adrien de Croy

Wednesday, 13 June 2007

Client information Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: RFC2617 erratum (editorial) Julian Reschke
Re: RFC2617 erratum (editorial) Alexey Melnikov
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
Re: [RFC] HTTP Timezone - rev4 Stefanos Harhalakis

Tuesday, 12 June 2007

Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Adrien de Croy
Re: [RFC] HTTP Timezone - rev4 Adrien de Croy
[RFC] HTTP Timezone - rev4 Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: RFC2617, digest domains Henrik Nordstrom
Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Dan Winship
Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Mark Nottingham
Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke
Re: charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: ISO-8859-1 reference Mark Nottingham
Re: ISSUE: header length limit with encoded words Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Mark Nottingham
Re: Closing issues 45 (NNTP Reference), 46 (references to RFC1700), 47 (inconsistency in date format explanation), 48 (Date reference typo) Mark Nottingham
Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Mark Nottingham
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
Re: RFC2617, digest domains Adrien de Croy
Re: RFC2617, digest domains Henrik Nordstrom

Monday, 11 June 2007

Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
Re: Timezone information in HTTP Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Jamie Lokier
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom

Sunday, 10 June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Martin Duerst
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Lisa Dusseault
Re: I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-02.txt V13

Saturday, 9 June 2007

Re: I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-02.txt Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Why the use of Date is restricted in requests Henrik Nordstrom
Fwd: Re: [PHP] [RFC] HTTP timezone Stefanos Harhalakis
I-D candidate: draft-sharhalakis-httptz-02.txt Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Timezone information in HTTP Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Timezone information in HTTP Henrik Nordstrom

Friday, 8 June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Peter Speck
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Joe Orton
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Yves Lafon
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Timezone information in HTTP Julian Reschke
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Travis Snoozy
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
RE: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Larry Masinter

Thursday, 7 June 2007

Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Lisa Dusseault
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Timezone information in HTTP Bjoern Hoehrmann
Timezone information in HTTP Stefanos Harhalakis
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis lists@ingostruck.de
Re: RFC2617 erratum (editorial) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Peter Speck
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Henrik Nordstrom
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
RE: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Robert Brewer
RFC2617 erratum (editorial) Julian Reschke
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Peter Speck
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Jim Gettys
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Leach
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Justin Erenkrantz
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Stewart Brodie
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Travis Snoozy
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Mike Dierken
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Mike Dierken
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Travis Snoozy
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Julian Reschke
RFC2616 vs RFC2617, was: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Julian Reschke
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Rob Burns
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
Re: [webkit-dev] Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Peter Speck
Accept- & Content-Resolution headers proposal Nicholas Shanks
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Alexey Melnikov

Wednesday, 6 June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Chris Newman

Tuesday, 5 June 2007

Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) David Morris

Monday, 4 June 2007

Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Julian Reschke
Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Julian Reschke
Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Julian Reschke
Re: Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Henrik Nordstrom

Sunday, 3 June 2007

Issue i17 (Revise description of the POST method) Julian Reschke

Friday, 1 June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis John C Klensin

Saturday, 2 June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom

Friday, 1 June 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Jamie Lokier
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Stefan Eissing
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Justin Erenkrantz
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Leif Johansson
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Jamie Lokier
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Roy T. Fielding
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Paul Leach
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom

Thursday, 31 May 2007

RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Roy T. Fielding
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Paul Leach
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Leach
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Paul Leach
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Eric Lawrence
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Cyrus Daboo
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Henrik Nordstrom
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Roy T. Fielding
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Robert Sayre
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Cyrus Daboo
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Robert Sayre
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Robert Sayre
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Yves Lafon
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Robert Sayre
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis -- call for errata/clarifications to 2617 Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
RE: Straw-man charter for http-bis Larry Masinter
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Henrik Nordstrom

Wednesday, 30 May 2007

Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis David Morris
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Robert Sayre
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Eliot Lear
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Keith Moore
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Paul Hoffman
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Alexey Melnikov
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Julian Reschke
Re: Straw-man charter for http-bis Alexey Melnikov
Straw-man charter for http-bis Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: ISO-8859-1 reference Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 23 May 2007

charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 Andreas Maier

Friday, 25 May 2007

Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Mark Karpelès

Wednesday, 30 May 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom

Tuesday, 29 May 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Jamie Lokier
Re: The use of trailers Adrien de Croy
Re: The use of trailers Henrik Nordstrom
Re: The use of trailers Adrien de Croy
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Jamie Lokier
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
Re: The use of trailers Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Jamie Lokier
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Julian Reschke
Re: The use of trailers Adrien de Croy
Re: The use of trailers Henrik Nordstrom

Monday, 28 May 2007

Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Henrik Nordstrom
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Jamie Lokier
Re: Planned for Chicago? Alexey Melnikov
Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Bjoern Hoehrmann
NEW ISSUE: classifying and updating informative references Julian Reschke
NEW ISSUE: ISO-8859-1 reference Julian Reschke
Closing issues 45 (NNTP Reference), 46 (references to RFC1700), 47 (inconsistency in date format explanation), 48 (Date reference typo) Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: example for matching functions, was: Weak and strong ETags Julian Reschke
Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Adrien de Croy
Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Henrik Nordstrom

Sunday, 27 May 2007

Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Jamie Lokier
Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Henrik Nordstrom
Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Jamie Lokier

Friday, 25 May 2007

Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Jeffrey Mogul
Re: Planned for Chicago? Robert Sayre
Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Henrik Nordstrom
RE: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Henrik Nordstrom
Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Adrien de Croy
RE: HTTP 'HASH' Method Eric Lawrence
Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Travis Snoozy
Re: HTTP 'HASH' Method Adrian Chadd
HTTP 'HASH' Method chown
Re: Escaping control characters in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) (was: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617)) Robert Sayre

Thursday, 24 May 2007

Wednesday, 23 May 2007

Re: charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 Julian Reschke
charset / Content-Type BNF flaw in RFC2616 Andreas Maier

Tuesday, 22 May 2007

Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Alexey Melnikov
Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Alexey Melnikov

Monday, 21 May 2007

Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke

Sunday, 20 May 2007

Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Alexey Melnikov

Friday, 18 May 2007

BOF request deadline Monday Lisa Dusseault

Thursday, 17 May 2007

RE: extending status codes Larry Masinter
Re: extending status codes Julian Reschke
Re: extending status codes Bjoern Hoehrmann
extending status codes Robert Sayre

Wednesday, 16 May 2007

Re: i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 Julian Reschke
Re: i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 15 May 2007

Re: i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 Julian Reschke
i19 - bodies on GET -- round 2 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 14 May 2007

ISSUE: header length limit with encoded words Bjoern Hoehrmann

Monday, 7 May 2007

Re: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads Julian Reschke
Re: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads Anthony Bryan

Thursday, 26 April 2007

Re: Resourcing HTTP work [was: Planned for Chicago?] Alexey Melnikov
Re: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads Julian Reschke
Resourcing HTTP work [was: Planned for Chicago?] Mark Nottingham
Re: Prague meeting report Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 25 April 2007

Planned for Chicago? David Morris
RE: Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads Eric Lawrence
Re: NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 Julian Reschke
Re: NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 Alexey Melnikov
Metalink: higher availability and integrity downloads albryan@comcast.net
i28 proposed replacement text Yves Lafon
Prague meeting report Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 24 April 2007

Re: handling Proxy-Connection Mark Nottingham
Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Mark Nottingham
Re: WPAD Support for IPv6 (on-topic?) Mark Nottingham
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location Mark Nottingham
Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Mark Nottingham
Re: Section 13 Mark Nottingham
Re: New issue: 6.1.1 can on a quick reading be misread that it's a complete list of status codes Mark Nottingham
Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 Mark Nottingham
Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Mark Nottingham

Friday, 20 April 2007

NEW ISSUE: WS in quoted-pair, was: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke
Re: ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Dan Winship
ISSUE 31: qdtext BNF Julian Reschke

Thursday, 19 April 2007

RE: NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location Eric Lawrence
Re: NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location Asbjørn Ulsberg
NEW ISSUE: redirection vs location Julian Reschke

Friday, 13 April 2007

Aqui esta una brillante oportunidad de hacer dinero en tiempo libre, accesible desde Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:51:42 -0800 daigo

Tuesday, 3 April 2007

WPAD Support for IPv6 (on-topic?) Eric Lawrence

Monday, 2 April 2007

Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Henrik Nordstrom
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Roy T. Fielding
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Jamie Lokier
Re: Section 13 Henrik Nordstrom
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd
SRV records and HTTP Mark Andrews

Sunday, 1 April 2007

Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Jamie Lokier
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Jamie Lokier
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Roy T. Fielding
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Jamie Lokier
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd
Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrien de Croy

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2007 21:40:38 UTC