- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:41:46 +0200
- To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- CC: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@cisco.com>
Jamie Lokier schrieb: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> The problem here is the definition of "semantic effect". It all depends >> on the client. An XCAP client will not consider XML reformatting to be >> important, as long as the Infoset is preserved. > > Even if there is a proxy cache in the network between the XCAP client > and the server, and the proxy cache does partial discard of large > entities, and byte-range requests (with If-Match) to refresh them? > > I think even an XCAP client would be lost in that case. Jamie, again: my understanding is that proxies are not allowed to cache the response from a PUT, thus this isn't a problem. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2006 12:41:53 UTC