- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:30:04 +0200
- To: sh@defuze.org
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sylvain Hellegouarch schrieb: >> Sylvain Hellegouarch schrieb: >>> Both are fair points. I am still not convinced by the way >>> Entity-Tranform >>> is specified though. It seems over complicated. Why not defining the >> Well, that's why I was submitting a draft -- feedback is needed. I >> realize that Entity-Transform currently may violate the KISS principle, >> maybe I should go back to it's minimal form of...: >> >> Entity-Transform = "Entity-Transform" ":" 1#transform-info >> transform-info = "identity" | "unspecified" > > +1 Hmm, I think this would still need to be transform-info = "identity" | "unspecified" | extension extension = token ...so it *can* be extended later. More feedback appreciated... Do people think it's worthwhile for a server to be able to specify the kind of transform? > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 07:30:09 UTC