Re: PUT vs strong ETags

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 10:12 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> > 

> > The use of the term "requested variant" is consistent with the use in
> > section 14.19 and elsewhere in the spec. It refers to the resource
> > identified by the request URI regardless of the method used.
> Now that's certainly not obvious, and it would be nice if this would 
> appear somewhere in the errata.

Before I add anything to the errata, I ask that specific text be posted
to the WG list and that it gets rough consensus there.

Scott Lawrence

Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2005 13:18:45 UTC