- From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Alex Rousskov wrote: > The bottom line: do you have any objections to fixing the RFC by > saying "proxies MUST NOT forward hop-by-hop headers" explicitly? If > yes, what are those objections? Sorry, I wasn't clear ... I've no issue with that change ... > > Let's leave the second change (i.e., listing hop-by-hop headers in the > Connection header) aside, for now. Yes, my issue is with specifications around clarification of what a "hop-by-hop" header is. Dave Morris
Received on Friday, 16 July 2004 20:42:19 UTC