ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2004 by date

Thursday, 30 September 2004

• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Anjels Green

Wednesday, 29 September 2004

• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 28 September 2004

• Re: MIME registration for application/gdiff Lisa Dusseault
• Re: MIME registration for application/gdiff Roy T. Fielding
• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 27 September 2004

• Re: MIME registration for application/gdiff Martin Duerst
• Re: MIME registration for application/gdiff Jamie Lokier
• Re: MIME registration for application/gdiff Julian Reschke
• Re: MIME registration for application/gdiff Lisa Dusseault

Wednesday, 22 September 2004

• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Graham Klyne
• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Mark Nottingham
• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Mark Nottingham
• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 21 September 2004

• Re: FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 19 September 2004

• Re: "205" status code Jamie Lokier
• Re: "205" status code Roy T. Fielding
• Re: "205" status code Jamie Lokier
• Re: "205" status code Jamie Lokier
• RE: "205" status code Joris Dobbelsteen
• "205" status code Joe Orton

Friday, 10 September 2004

• Re: Clarification of HTTP Digest authentication Jim Luther
• Clarification of HTTP Digest authentication Michael Sweet

Thursday, 9 September 2004

• FYI: draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-01 Mark Nottingham

Friday, 3 September 2004

• Re (2): quota-03 spec review, was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-03.txt edgar@edgarschwarz.de

Thursday, 2 September 2004

• Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-05.txt Julian Reschke
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-05.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-05.txt Lisa Dusseault
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-05.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-05.txt Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 31 August 2004

• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-05.txt Lisa Dusseault

Tuesday, 24 August 2004

• Re: PATCH proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: PATCH proposal Geoffrey M Clemm
• Re: PATCH proposal Joe Hildebrand

Monday, 23 August 2004

• Re: PATCH proposal Lisa Dusseault
• Re: PATCH proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: PATCH proposal Lisa Dusseault
• **SPAM** test marisol@w3.org
• Re: Set-Cookie w/ Expires Bjoern Hoehrmann

Sunday, 22 August 2004

• Set-Cookie w/ Expires Mark Nottingham

Friday, 20 August 2004

• Re: PATCH proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: PATCH proposal Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 18 August 2004

• PATCH proposal Lisa Dusseault

Tuesday, 17 August 2004

• Digest authentication: using auth-int QOP with no entity body Stewart Brodie

Tuesday, 10 August 2004

• **SPAM** Information frystyk@w3.org

Sunday, 25 July 2004

• Comments on draft-dusseault-http-patch-03 Julian Reschke

Saturday, 24 July 2004

• **SPAM** Re: Excel file em@w3.org

Friday, 23 July 2004

• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Alex Rousskov
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Jamie Lokier
• **SPAM** Re: Is that your document? david.orchard@bea.com
• RE: Re: Query String format still undefined ? Agnieszka Szczurowska R (TX/EUS)

Thursday, 22 July 2004

• Re: Query String format still undefined ? Agnieszka Szczurowska R (TX/EUS)

Saturday, 17 July 2004

• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? David Morris

Friday, 16 July 2004

• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Alex Rousskov
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Alex Rousskov

Wednesday, 14 July 2004

• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? David Morris

Tuesday, 13 July 2004

• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Jamie Lokier
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Alex Rousskov
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Alex Rousskov
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Jamie Lokier

Monday, 12 July 2004

• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Robert Collins
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? David Morris
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? David Morris
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Alex Rousskov
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Jamie Lokier
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Alex Rousskov
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Jamie Lokier
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Proxies, how to determine response body length Robert Olofsson
• Re: Proxies, how to determine response body length Jamie Lokier
• Proxies, how to determine response body length Jan Novy

Saturday, 10 July 2004

• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Jamie Lokier
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Alex Rousskov
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Jeffrey Mogul

Friday, 9 July 2004

• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Roy T.Fielding
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Jamie Lokier
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Lisa Dusseault
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Roy T.Fielding
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Justin Chapweske
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Lisa Dusseault
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Jeffrey Mogul
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Scott Lawrence
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Lisa Dusseault
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Scott Lawrence
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Lisa Dusseault
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Jamie Lokier
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Julian Reschke
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Scott Lawrence
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Lisa Dusseault

Thursday, 8 July 2004

• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Jamie Lokier
• Re: Query String format still undefined ? Jamie Lokier
• Re: FYI: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-http-patch-02.txt Lisa Dusseault

Wednesday, 7 July 2004

• Query String format still undefined ? Stephan Hesmer

Tuesday, 6 July 2004

• Re: Meaning of header fields Date: and Age: Alex Rousskov
• Re: Meaning of header fields Date: and Age: Koen Holtman
• Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation? Alex Rousskov
• Re: Meaning of header fields Date: and Age: Alex Rousskov
• Meaning of header fields Date: and Age: Greg Robson-Garth

Friday, 2 July 2004

• Thank you for subscribing Divotworld

Thursday, 1 July 2004

• Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:10:33 -0600 Ht

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 2004 13:41:09 UTC