- From: James Lacey <jlacey@ftw.paging.mot.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 07:46:33 -0500 (CST)
- To: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
I'm using HTTP in an application as a transport for XML documents that are 'POSTed' to a servlet for processing. I am using persistent connections and I have a need to in some situations send a 'control message' back to a client indicating that they have temporarily blocked from sending any more requests to the server (say for example that the server has become very busy and would like clients to stop sending requests until he can get caught up). I've thought about using chunked encoding to respond to a request with a chunked message whose body indicates to the client he/she has been blocked. At a later time I can then send back another chunk indicating the client is no longer blocked, then send back a chunk that has the response to the original request, and then send back the zero chunk to indicate the end of the response. I have some misgivings about this because I feel that it would be using the chunked encoding for a purpose that it was not intended for and the chunks should all collectively, once concatenated together, make up the response to the original request. Does anyone have any thoughts on this either way? Is it an OK thing to do or is it a violation of the spirit of the protocol? One problem I can see is that chunked responses are probably assembled together on the client side at the session layer while the 'special' control message needs to be understood at the application layer. It would be bad for the session layer to have to know about application layer control messages and somehow dispatch the event that one has been received to the application lauyer. thx, --jl
Received on Friday, 5 May 2000 05:49:48 UTC