- From: Kevin J. Dyer <kdyer@draper.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 11:27:50 -0500
- To: IETF HTTP WG <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
At 06:45 PM 12/9/99 , Rohit Khare wrote:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade-04.txt
>
>is awaiting IESG announcement of an Internet-wide last call -- it was
>LC'd at TLS-WG and here. It will establish a new IANA registry for new
>reply codes.
Thanks, I did notice the error registry component since the main topic of
the draft was TLS.
>Policies, forms, etc. can be found there...
>
>Thanks,
>Rohit
>
>PS. I'm conspicuously ducking the question of whether your intended
>application is "correct" or not; this is just an answer to the question of
>"how"...
Question to the group: Should we set aside a block of error codes in each
range for local requirements? I compare this to
the reserved blocks of IP addresses for us behind
NATs or standalone systems.
===========================================================
Kevin J. Dyer Draper Laboratory MS 35
Email: <kdyer@draper.com> 555 Tech. Sq.
Phone: 617-258-4962 Cambridge, MA 02139
FAX: 617-258-2061
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/
Data Management & Information Navigation Systems
===========================================================
Received on Monday, 13 December 1999 08:35:14 UTC