RE: Last Call: Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1 to Proposed Standard

> > [3] definitely appears to be normative. Can we get Eric's Document
> > advanced (This question is to the working group)?

> [3] documents existing practice for https

However this is still a normative reference, meaning that you need to 
have this document to understand what is being discussed. That is why 
I suggested that Eric's document be reviewed by the WG and submitted 
as a Proposed Standard.

> [5] is noted because it defines an HTTP status code - we could remove 
> from this document and let them add an entry to the registry we are
> creating.
> [8] is an expired draft, referenced only because it was the original
> description - this document replaces it as far as standards track is
> concerned.

These are not a problem.


Received on Monday, 18 October 1999 06:43:57 UTC