- From: Jeffrey Schiller <jis@mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 20:27:57 +0100 (BST)
- To: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
- CC: Jeffrey Schiller <jis@mit.edu>, IETF Transport Layer Security WG <ietf-tls@lists.consensus.com>, Rohit Khare <rohit@ics.uci.edu>, "Http-Wg@Hplb. Hpl. Hp. Com" <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> > [3] definitely appears to be normative. Can we get Eric's Document > > advanced (This question is to the working group)? > [3] documents existing practice for https However this is still a normative reference, meaning that you need to have this document to understand what is being discussed. That is why I suggested that Eric's document be reviewed by the WG and submitted as a Proposed Standard. > [5] is noted because it defines an HTTP status code - we could remove it > from this document and let them add an entry to the registry we are > creating. > [8] is an expired draft, referenced only because it was the original > description - this document replaces it as far as standards track is > concerned. These are not a problem. -Jeff
Received on Monday, 18 October 1999 06:43:57 UTC