- From: Josh Cohen (Exchange) <joshco@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 15:42:53 -0700
- To: 'John Stracke' <francis@ecal.com>, http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Stracke [mailto:francis@ecal.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 11:30 AM > To: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com > Subject: Re: Host header issue > > This isn't necessarily pathological. My home network > includes a proxy; it runs > Apache with mod_proxy, and that same Apache also serves up > its own content. It > has two CNAMEs, "proxy" and "www"; my browser is configured > to use "proxy" as > its proxy. So, if I send my browser to http://www/foo.html, > then Apache gets a > request whose request-URI is http://www/foo.html. It knows > that www is itself, > so it delivers its own content. > In which case you really dont need the Host: header... hence my point.. > -- > /============================================================\ > |John Stracke |http://www.ecal.com|My opinions are my own.| > |Chief Scientist |===========================================| > |eCal Corp. |"Who died and made you king?" "My father." | > |francis@ecal.com| | > \============================================================/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 1999 15:47:20 UTC