- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 08:50:32 +1000
- To: kugler@us.ibm.com
- Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com, http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> In that case, I think you want the "Accept-Encoding" header, not TE. (Make sure > you're looking at a fresh copy of the spec.) The issue is of content-encoding > vs. transfer-encoding. No, I was thinking of transfer-encoding, which can be used for compression-type services. Content-Encoding would be interesting, but potentially it really isn't as user-transparent as most of the other facilities I'm talking about. Will think about it...
Received on Saturday, 4 September 1999 13:53:55 UTC