> In that case, I think you want the "Accept-Encoding" header, not TE. (Make sure > you're looking at a fresh copy of the spec.) The issue is of content-encoding > vs. transfer-encoding. No, I was thinking of transfer-encoding, which can be used for compression-type services. Content-Encoding would be interesting, but potentially it really isn't as user-transparent as most of the other facilities I'm talking about. Will think about it...Received on Saturday, 4 September 1999 13:53:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:06 UTC