W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: Resend: Re: IPP> Chunked POST: SUMMARY

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 00:29:38 -0800
To: kugler@us.ibm.com
Cc: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com, "Hastings,\ Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com, ipp@pwg.org
Message-Id: <9901240030.aa05315@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/318
>Roy, would implementing it as a Java servlet be braindead?

That depends on the servlet API.

>Should every
>application that uses HTTP as a transport build in its own HTTP
>implementation, even if one is already available on the platform?

No application should use HTTP as a transport.  If it used HTTP as HTTP,
there wouldn't be any need for a separate implementation, but it would
still be desirable to base the service on the best capabilities of HTTP
and not on the characteristics that might be true of some other resources
that are accessible via HTTP.

Received on Sunday, 24 January 1999 00:36:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:06 UTC