- From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:47:55 +0000
- To: "Http-Wg@Hplb. Hpl. Hp. Com" <http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Scott Lawrence wrote: > Part of the goal here is to show how secured and unsecured traffic in any > protocol can share a TCP well known port, so that we can get away from > assigning two ports to each protocol. But aren't there security benefits to having separate ports (e.g., making it possible to run your secure server in a separate process)? -- /=============================================================\ |John Stracke | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK | |francis@ecal.com|============================================| |Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed | |eCal Corp. | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch | \=============================================================/
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 1999 09:54:39 UTC