W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1998

RE: Cache-Control and Pragma

From: Nottingham, Mark (Australia) <mark_nottingham@exchange.au.ml.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 15:16:55 +1100
Message-Id: <D900F0C3D524D111971F00805F0D50E10157FF7A@SV-MEEXCH-01.au.ml.com>
To: "'chankhun@netapp.com'" <chankhun@netapp.com>
Cc: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/284
There seems to be a lot of references to Pragma: no-cache response
headers out there, and they are in fairly common usage (I believe
someone from Squid could give stats on what they've seen, probably). I
believe that I was pointed to them by someone on this list a while back,
so it might be worthwhile to (eventually) clear it up.

BTW anawat, the behavior re: pragma and Cache-control that we were
asking for will no longer be necessary ;-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: chankhun@netapp.com [mailto:chankhun@netapp.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 1998 7:02 AM
> To: mogul@pa.dec.com
> Cc: mark_nottingham@exchange.au.ml.com; http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> Subject: Re: Cache-Control and Pragma
> > While it is possible that some caches do look at "Pragma" headers in
> > responses, I don't know of any specific proxy software that does.  I
> > checked both Squid 1.1.20 and an ancient copy of the CERN 
> server/proxy
> Netcache from netapp does.
> Anawat
Received on Thursday, 10 December 1998 20:22:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:06 UTC