- From: Nottingham, Mark (Australia) <mark_nottingham@exchange.au.ml.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 15:16:55 +1100
- To: "'chankhun@netapp.com'" <chankhun@netapp.com>
- Cc: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
There seems to be a lot of references to Pragma: no-cache response headers out there, and they are in fairly common usage (I believe someone from Squid could give stats on what they've seen, probably). I believe that I was pointed to them by someone on this list a while back, so it might be worthwhile to (eventually) clear it up. BTW anawat, the behavior re: pragma and Cache-control that we were asking for will no longer be necessary ;-) > -----Original Message----- > From: chankhun@netapp.com [mailto:chankhun@netapp.com] > Sent: Friday, December 11, 1998 7:02 AM > To: mogul@pa.dec.com > Cc: mark_nottingham@exchange.au.ml.com; http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com > Subject: Re: Cache-Control and Pragma > > > > While it is possible that some caches do look at "Pragma" headers in > > responses, I don't know of any specific proxy software that does. I > > checked both Squid 1.1.20 and an ancient copy of the CERN > server/proxy > > Netcache from netapp does. > > Anawat >
Received on Thursday, 10 December 1998 20:22:10 UTC