W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1998

Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135,

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 20:22:22 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199811171922.UAA24617@wsooti08.win.tue.nl>
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
Cc: jg@pa.dec.com, gadams@spyglass.com, masinter@parc.xerox.com, http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/259
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen:
>At 15:34 11/16/98 -0800, Jim Gettys wrote:
>>Basically, the q-values are used as binary values. Understanding deflate
>>with -.65 doesn't make a lot of sense to me."
>Just to clear out any confusion, the dash is not a minus - it's a typo.

I believe the reason for allowing q values like 0.65 here is that it
allows a client to express a preference for a particular hop-level
compression algorithm. E.g.

 TE: chunked, compress;q=0.65, gzip;q=0.8

would mean that gzip compression is preferred over compress-style


Received on Tuesday, 17 November 1998 11:36:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:06 UTC