- From: Ross Patterson <ROSSP@ss1.reston.vmd.sterling.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 98 10:43:25 EST
- To: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
In section 4.2 "Message Headers", the statement "It MUST be possible to combine the multiple header fields into one "field-name: field-value" pair, without changing the semantics of the message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each separated by a comma." is a restatement of the preceding requirement, "Multiple message-header fields with the same field-name MAY be present in a message if and only if the entire field-value for that header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)]." placing a requirement upon future extensions to the protocol rather than on implementations of HTTP 1.1. I think the "MUST" should be changed to a "must". Ross Patterson VM Software Division Sterling Software, Inc.
Received on Monday, 9 November 1998 09:13:07 UTC