W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1998

200 Level warnings in revalidation

From: Chris DiPierro <cdipierr@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:35:17 +0100 (BST)
To: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <5040500020876530000002L002*@MHS>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/57
The spec says that all 200 level warnings must be retained after a successful

However, it also says that all end-to-end headers (Warnings are end-to-end)
must be replaced after by the corresponding end-to-end header in a revalidation.

So if we had a cached copy of an entity that has a 200 level warning associated
with it and when we revalidate, we get a Warning header w/o the 200 level
warning, are we supposed to keep it or not?

Received on Thursday, 24 September 1998 09:47:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:05 UTC