- From: Chris DiPierro <cdipierr@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:35:17 +0100 (BST)
- To: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
The spec says that all 200 level warnings must be retained after a successful revalidation. However, it also says that all end-to-end headers (Warnings are end-to-end) must be replaced after by the corresponding end-to-end header in a revalidation. So if we had a cached copy of an entity that has a 200 level warning associated with it and when we revalidate, we get a Warning header w/o the 200 level warning, are we supposed to keep it or not? Thanks, Chris
Received on Thursday, 24 September 1998 09:47:50 UTC