Re: CNONCE: proposed resolution

Paul Leach wrote:

> I think that absence of cnonce should be illegal if qop=auth or
> qop=auth-int is selected by the client; if the client really _demands_ 
> to be totally braindead, it can send a constant as its cnonce.

I'm also happy with that solution.

-- 
Scott Lawrence           Consulting Engineer      <lawrence@agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc.  Embedded Web Technology   http://www.agranat.com/

Received on Monday, 3 August 1998 14:22:37 UTC