- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 14:39:29 -0400
- To: jg@w3.org, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: dmk@research.bell-labs.com, paulle@microsoft.com
After further discussions with Jim, we propose the following resolution: Clarify the existing possibility of including an etag in a 201 response and don't do anything about potential other metainformation as this is a problem in many other places as well. Basically, in HTTP it's hard to know what is metainformation and what is transaction information. Action: Add this clarification to section 10.2.2: A 201 response MAY contain an Etag response header field indicating the current value of the entity tag for the created requested variant, see [14.19]. Any objections or comments? Henrik -- Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 1998 11:40:36 UTC