W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1998

Re: new issue: confusing statement about HTTP/1.1 version numbers

From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 11:38:36 -0500 (EST)
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980331113745.4051C-100000@alice.agranat.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/12


I too find Jeffs wording to be an improvement, and don't believe that in
any way changes the intent (that is, I think that it is editorial).

Received on Tuesday, 31 March 1998 08:40:03 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Previous message: rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com: "new issue: confusing statement about HTTP/1.1 version numbers"
In reply to: Jeffrey Mogul: "new issue: confusing statement about HTTP/1.1 version numbers"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Mogul: "new editorial issue: redundancy in 3.7.2 (Multipart Types)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:05 UTC