- From: Jim Gettys <jg@pa.dec.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 10:39:58 -0800
- To: Dave Kristol <dmk@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
> > 14.26 If-None-Match > I was disappointed that the pseudo-code didn't make it. OTOH, > there are now disclaimers about mixing various conditional > headers, which accomplishes the same thing. > > I would like to see stronger advice in 13.3.4 about what > combinations of conditional headers a client can send reliably to a > server (or which combinations it must not send). > I was/am opposed to having two independent specifications present in the same document; it leads to questions about which is correct. I felt it was better to clarify the text to remove the ambiguity. I would not oppose publishing the pseudo-code as an informational RFC document, with a disclaimer that the base specification rules. - Jim
Received on Thursday, 26 March 1998 10:41:43 UTC