> > 14.26 If-None-Match > I was disappointed that the pseudo-code didn't make it. OTOH, > there are now disclaimers about mixing various conditional > headers, which accomplishes the same thing. > > I would like to see stronger advice in 13.3.4 about what > combinations of conditional headers a client can send reliably to a > server (or which combinations it must not send). > I was/am opposed to having two independent specifications present in the same document; it leads to questions about which is correct. I felt it was better to clarify the text to remove the ambiguity. I would not oppose publishing the pseudo-code as an informational RFC document, with a disclaimer that the base specification rules. - JimReceived on Thursday, 26 March 1998 10:41:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC