W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1998

Re: 505 response a MUST?

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:33:57 -0800
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>, Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>, jg@w3.org
Message-Id: <9802271533.aa04454@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/5415
>>  ... and section 3.1 spells out various rules about version number
>>  usage, but does not specify that a server MUST send a 505 response
>>  if it receives a major version number higher than the highest
>>  version it implements.

That isn't why 505 was created.  It allows a future server to deny
service to older protocols.  Since we cannot know whether HTTP/2.0
is incompatible with HTTP/1.1 (the major version change does not imply
incompatibility, it just removes the requirement for compatibility),
it is inappropriate for a server to be required to respond in error
to a message it might be able to respond to normally.  That's why it
is not a MUST, and why Apache responds normally to an HTTP-version of
HTTP/2.0 if it can interpret the request as an HTTP/1.1 server.

Received on Friday, 27 February 1998 15:57:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC