- From: Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se>
- Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 12:48:37 +0100
- To: IETF working group on HTML in e-mail <mhtml@segate.sunet.se>, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
The MHTML group will probably want to handle Content-Base in the same
way as the HTTP group. We understand that the HTTP group has decided
to remove the Content-Base header field, and we will probably do the
same.
Question: RFC 2068 did contain a Content-Base header. How will
this circumstance be handled in the new HTTP standard?
(1) Write nothing at all about Content-Base.
(2) Mention somewhere that an earlier version of this standard
had a header Content-Base hwich has been removed.
(3) Indicate Content-Base as an obsolete syntax, which servers
are recommended to accept for receipt during an interim
period, but not use in new HTTP headers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme
Received on Saturday, 7 February 1998 09:42:30 UTC