W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1998

RE: Mandatory draft first revision - please comment!

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 20:35:44 -0800
Message-Id: <3FF8121C9B6DD111812100805F31FC0D0113C6A5@red-msg-59.dns.microsoft.com>
To: 'Henrik Frystyk Nielsen' <frystyk@w3.org>, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/5240
Why does this spec insist on being more than one paragraph long?

All we need is a "Mandatory" header followed by the names of header fields
that MUST be understood. That is it. No fancy namespaces, no extensions,

Now if you want to add those fancy features, fine, define a "fancy-features"

While we are at it, what happened to the section on changing method names to
"PEP-*"? We need this if we are ever going to deploy.

All this having been said I want to congratulate Henrik et all on really
paring down the spec. It is much better than before. With just a little more
cutting we will finally have something we can deploy.


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [SMTP:frystyk@w3.org]
> Sent:	Tuesday, January 20, 1998 1:43 PM
> To:	ietf-http-ext@w3.org
> Subject:	Mandatory draft first revision - please comment!
> Here's the ID that I just submitted to the IETF under the name
> 	draft-frystyk-http-mandatory
> I have also made it available as
> "http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/ietf-http-ext/draft-frystyk-http-mandato
> ry
> -00.txt" so that we at least can point to it.
> Henrik
> --
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
> World Wide Web Consortium
> http://www.w3.org/People/Frystyk << File:
> draft-frystyk-http-mandatory-00.txt >> 
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 1998 05:07:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC