RE: Some comments on Digest Auth

Yaron Goland <> wrote:

  > Oh wait, I thought we were requiring that nonces never be re-used. If not
  > then that is cool, the next-nonce header should go into a SEPARATE
  > specification from the draft digest auth proposal. Since it is 100%
  > compatible with RFC 2069 and the draft digest auth proposal I don't see any
  > reason to shove it into the main digest auth spec. It can ride on its own.

My understanding is that the behavior of "nonce" is at the origin
server's discretion.  It can be one-time, time-limited, eternal,
whatever.  It's up to the implementation.

Dave Kristol

Received on Monday, 19 January 1998 15:02:50 UTC