W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1998

Has the Content-Length issue been resolved?

From: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 13:39:11 -0600 (CST)
To: Jim Gettys <jg@pa.dec.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980115133524.28633B-100000@hopf.math.nwu.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/5190


Has the Content-Length issue be resolved?  I.e. is the Content-Length
value the length before or after a Transfer-encoding is supplied?

Whichever it is, it must be clearly stated in the specification and
I don't see this on the issues list.


John Franks
john@math.nwu.edu

Received on Thursday, 15 January 1998 11:43:59 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jacob Palme: "Re: Multiple Content-Location headers"
Previous message: Koen Holtman: "New content negotiation draft available"
In reply to: Jim Gettys: "Re: editorial glitch in section 14.19 (now IN-THEORY editorial issue)"
Next in thread: Life is hard... and then you die.: "Re: Has the Content-Length issue been resolved?"
Maybe reply: Life is hard... and then you die.: "Re: Has the Content-Length issue been resolved?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC