At 16.21 -0800 98-01-13, Einar Stefferud wrote: > It seems clear that we should now explore the idea of having: > > No More Than One Content-Base; No More Than One Content-Location; and > Multiple instances of Content-Location-Alternative headers, where-in > it is required that the Content-Location-Alternative values must be > alternative URIs for the exact same content as that which is inclosed > in the same MIME PART of an Compound MHTML Object. > > We must remember that all MIME headers must start with "Content-" Right! That seems to be the right way to handle this issue. And then we can avoid the problem which the MHTML group had in whether to be able to derive a base from the Content-Location header if there was more than one of them. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se> (Stockholm University and KTH) for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalmeReceived on Wednesday, 14 January 1998 12:40:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC