Re: Multiple Content-Location headers

At 16.21 -0800 98-01-13, Einar Stefferud wrote:
> It seems clear that we should now explore the idea of having:
>
> No More Than One Content-Base; No More Than One Content-Location; and
> Multiple instances of Content-Location-Alternative headers, where-in
> it is required that the Content-Location-Alternative values must be
> alternative URIs for the exact same content as that which is inclosed
> in the same MIME PART of an Compound MHTML Object.
>
> We must remember that all MIME headers must start with "Content-"

Right! That seems to be the right way to handle this issue.
And then we can avoid the problem which the MHTML group had in
whether to be able to derive a base from the Content-Location
header if there was more than one of them.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme