W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1998

Re: Multiple Content-Location headers

From: Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 21:14:30 +0100
Message-Id: <v03110704b0e2cce64f9e@[]>
To: Stef@nma.com, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, IETF working group on HTML in e-mail <mhtml@segate.sunet.se>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/5178
At 16.21 -0800 98-01-13, Einar Stefferud wrote:
> It seems clear that we should now explore the idea of having:
> No More Than One Content-Base; No More Than One Content-Location; and
> Multiple instances of Content-Location-Alternative headers, where-in
> it is required that the Content-Location-Alternative values must be
> alternative URIs for the exact same content as that which is inclosed
> in the same MIME PART of an Compound MHTML Object.
> We must remember that all MIME headers must start with "Content-"

Right! That seems to be the right way to handle this issue.
And then we can avoid the problem which the MHTML group had in
whether to be able to derive a base from the Content-Location
header if there was more than one of them.

Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 1998 12:40:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC