W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1998

Re: Multiple Content-Location headers

From: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 98 13:49:29 PST
Message-Id: <9801122149.AA13886@acetes.pa.dec.com>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: jpalme@dsv.su.se
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/5150
[Oops, sent this out before filling in the citation to the paper.]

    Sorry if I am missing something, but is duplicate suppression really a
    big issue ? And for what reason ?
    Last time I checked (which was perhaps in summer '96, and looking at
    cache performance) on our proxy, the amount of duplicate objects
    was very small -- at least in size, I think it was maybe between
    1 and 2% of the total cache size.

A recent paper showed that 18% of the references in a trace were
for duplicated content (sorry, I don't have figures based on # of
bytes).  See

Also, the DRP people are thinking in terms of doing software
distribution via HTTP.  A lot of programs are composed of
a small core plus a lot of library modules; the DRP people would
like to avoid retransmitting the same library over the network
more than once, while still being able to ensure that different
versions of a library are properly managed.  (I.e., the duplicate
suppression mechanism should not substitute one version of a library
for another, since this substitution might break the program that
uses the library.)   If this use of HTTP becomes popular, the number
of bytes of duplicated content could increase dramatically.

This is still in the early stages of discussion, and it probably
shouldn't waste bandwidth on the HTTP-WG mailing list at this point.

Received on Monday, 12 January 1998 13:55:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC